Obama vs. Tea Parties: Uvidenhed er styrke

Hvis du ikke læser andet i dag, kan du overveje at læse denne artikel fra New York Times:

It’s not just that 46 percent of Republicans believe the lie that Obama is a Muslim, or that 27 percent in the party doubt that the president of the United States is a citizen. But fully half of them believe falsely that the big bailout of banks and insurance companies under TARP was enacted by Obama, and not by President Bush.

Take a look at Tuesday night’s box score in the baseball game between New York and Toronto. The Yankees won, 11-5. Now look at the weather summary, showing a high of 71 for New York. The score and temperature are not subject to debate.

Yet a president’s birthday or whether he was even in the White House on the day TARP was passed are apparently open questions. A growing segment of the party poised to take control of Congress has bought into denial of the basic truths of Barack Obama’s life. What’s more, this astonishing level of willful ignorance has come about largely by design, and has been aided by a press afraid to call out the primary architects of the lies. […]

So where is this “media?” Two sources, and they are — no surprise here — the usual suspects. The first, of course, is Rush Limbaugh, who claims the largest radio audience in the land among the microphone demagogues, and his word is Biblical among Republicans. A few quick examples of the Limbaugh method:

“Tomorrow is Obama’s birthday — not that we’ve seen any proof of that,” he said on Aug. 3. “They tell us Aug. 4 is the birthday; we haven’t seen any proof of that.”

Of course, there is proof as clear as that baseball box score. Look here, www.factcheck.org, for starters, one of many places posting Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate.

On the Muslim deception, Limbaugh has sprinkled lie dust all over the place. “Obama says he’s a Christian, but where’s the evidence?” he said on Aug. 19. He has repeatedly called the president “imam Obama,” and said, “I’m just throwing things out there, folks, because people are questioning his Christianity.”

You see how he works. He drops in suggestions, hints, notes that “people are questioning” things. The design is to make Obama un-American. Then he says it’s a tweak, a provocation. He says this as a preemptive way to keep the press from calling him out. And it works; long profiles of Limbaugh have largely gone easy on him. […]

“I am a devout Christian,” Obama told Christianity Today in 2008. “I believe in the redemptive death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.” That’s not enough, apparently, for Rev. Franklin Graham, the partisan son of the great evangelical leader, who said last week that Obama was “born a Muslim because of the religious seed passed on from his father.”

Actually, he was born from two non-practicing parents, and his Kenyan father was absent for all of his upbringing. Obama came to his Christianity like millions of people, through searching and questioning.

Finally, there is Fox News, whose parent company has given $1 million to Republican causes this year but still masquerades as a legitimate source of news. Their chat and opinion programs spread innuendo daily. The founder of Politifact, another nonpartisan referee to the daily rumble, said two of the site’s five most popular items on its Truth-o-meter are corrections of Glenn Beck.

Beck tosses off enough half-truths in a month to keep Politifact working overtime. Of late, he has gone after Michelle Obama, whose vacation in Spain was “just for her and approximately 40 of her friends.” Limbaugh had a similar line, saying the First Lady “is taking 40 of her best friends and leasing 60 rooms at a five-star hotel — paid for by you.”

The White House said Michelle Obama and her daughter Sasha were accompanied by just a few friends — and they paid their own costs. But, wink, wink, the damage is done. He’s Muslim and foreign. She’s living the luxe life on your dime. They don’t even have to mention race. The code words do it for them.

Det lader til at være højrefløjens version af de tåbelige 9/11-konspirationsteorier, bortset fra, at disse propagandisters racistiske og intolerante karakter og Limbaughs og Fox News’ magtfulde position gør Tea Party-løgnene langt farligere. Hvor Limbaugh sår, høster ekstremisterne – senest ved det morderiske overfald på en muslimsk taxi-chauffør i New York.

I Danmark ville Dansk Folkeparti gøre det samme, hvis de havde kanalerne til det. Vi ser det allerede på Jyllands-Postens blogsektion, hvor den danske højrefløjs svar på Gøg og Gokke, de notoriske løgnere og islamomaner Kasper Støvring og Morten Uhrskov, der under stor applaus og mange skældsord  fra de kommentatorer, der virkelig tror på, at Danmark er blevet overtaget af islam og følgelig gerne så alle muslimer eskorteret til grænsen, erklærer deres støtte til voldsfikserede amerikanske politikere og udspreder miskrediterede løgne om mosker på Ground Zero, og hvad ved jeg. Forskellen er endnu, at den slags endnu ikke har nogen platform i Danmark, hvorfor der ikke er nogen tænkende mennesker, der tager dem alvorligt.

Men dagen kunne komme. Hvis Pia Kjærsgaard havde et Fox News, ville hun bruge det, og det er en skræmmende tanke. Lad os håbe, at eventuelle forsøg i den retning vil blive afvist af en enig nation af know-somethings, som de komiske Alier Uhrskov&Støvrings løgne allerede bliver det af de mere tænksomme af Jyllands-Postens debattører.

Link: Building a Nation of Know-Nothings

Dagens citat: Samfundsklasser

Eugene V. Debs, udtalelse i den retssag, hvor han blev dømt for undergravende virksomhed:

Your Honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth. I said then, and I say now, that while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.

Imod nationalisternes misbrug af Gay Pride

Enhedslisten har som parti valgt at deltage i denne weekends Gay Pride i København.

Det er partiets queer-udvalg til dels imod. Læs her hvorfor:

Parallelt med øgede rettigheder i forhold til ægteskab, adoption, insemination, diskrimination på arbejdsmarkedet osv. bliver LGBT-sagen i stigende grad udnyttet i racistiske og nationalistiske dagsordener.

LGBT’ere har de sidste 50 år tilkæmpet sig små stykker af den danske normalitetskage – hvilket uden tvivl gør dagligdagen en del mindre bitter for mange.

Til gengæld bruges LGBT-sagen i stigende grad som skyts i divers imperiale og racistiske projekter. »Befrielse« af kvinder og seksuelle minoriteter legitimerer vestlige angrebskrige i f.eks. Afghanistan, ligesom krav om »homotolerance« og »ligestilling« bruges som argumenter for at underkaste migranter ekstra mistænkeliggørende teknologier, når de ønsker at søge opholdstilladelse i Danmark.

Samtidig er der stort set ingen europæiske lande, der accepterer forfølgelse på baggrund af seksualitet som et argument for asyl – så meget for Vesten som homoparadis!

Accept af LGBT-personer bliver oftere og oftere markedsført som »særlig dansk«, ligesom homofobi og hate crimes ses som fænomener, der stort set ikke eksisterer i den danske hyggestat. Trans- og homofobi fremstilles som noget, der kommer fra »fremmede kulturer« – men det er altså denne danske »hyggestat«, der patologiserer personer, der ikke ønsker at indrette sig efter et rigidt to-kønssystem og som kræver årelange psykolog-forløb og sterilisering, hvis man juridisk ønsker at skifte køn.

JPEG - 15.5 kb

Vi vil ikke reagere med mild ligegyldighed over at blive brugt som skyts i en nationalistisk dagsorden. Vi vil ikke spille taktisk med på islamofobi og fremmedhad for at vinde LGBT-kampe. Når ikke-statsborgere skal tvangsdeporteres fra dansk territorium, vil vi stå forrest i rækken af blokader. Når Israel fremstilles som den homovenlige modvægt til de slemme islamiske fundamentalister, vil vi stille os solidariske med de palæstinensiske og libanesiske LGBT-organisationer, der får frataget vestlig ngo-funding, fordi de tillader sig at kritisere apartheid-tilstande og staten Israels militære overfald i Gaza og Libanon.

Alt dette vil vi gøre, fordi LGBT-rettigheder som del af en nationalistisk og imperial dagsorden er som at pisse i bukserne for at holde varmen.

Læs selv resten på Modkraft.dk.

Det er ikke kun muslimer, der kan beklage sig over fremstillingen af deres profet

Kristne kan også. I Libanon har klager fra kristne ført til, at to TV-stationer stryger en TV-serie om Jesus, hvor Jesus fremstilles som ikke-guddommelig profet i den islamiske tradition.

Fra Jyllands-Posten:

Der bliver hverken gjort nar eller tegnet karikaturer. Alligevel dropper den shia-muslimske organisation Hizbollahs tv-station i Libanon, al-Manar, og en anden libanesisk tv-station, NBN, at sende de resterende 15 ud af 17 afsnit af tv-serien “al-Masih” (“Messias”), der handler om Jesus.

Problemet er, at kristne libanesere har klaget over serien, fordi den omtaler Jesus som profet i et muslimsk perspektiv og ikke i rollen som frelser og Guds søn, der er den traditionelle kristne opfattelse af Jesus. Ifølge islam er Jesus en profet, men ikke Guds søn, og den kristne tro på, at Jesus blev korsfæstet og genopstod fra de døde, er heller ikke en del af islamisk tradition.”Serien er blottet for respekt for Jesus, kirken og kristendom,” siger den katolske ærkebiskop Bechara al-Rai, der har ført an i kritikken af serien.

For at undgå yderligere splittelse i Libanon, der er delt mellem 17 forskellige etniske og religiøse grupper, har de to tv-stationer aflyst resten af serien, til trods for at den var planlagt til at strække sig over hele muslimernes igangværende fastemåned, ramadanen.

“Selvom programmet handler om den store personlighed, Guds profet, søn af Maria, fred være med ham, stopper vi det af respekt for andre religiøse grupper i Libanon,” står der i en fælles pressemeddelelse fra al-Manar og NBN.

Jeg venter nu i åndeløs spænding på pressemeddelsen fra Trykkefrihedsselskabet, der skoser de libanesiske TV-stationer for deres misforståede hensyntagen til den kristne religion og forlanger, at TV-serien i det mindste vises på DR2. Men jeg kommer nok til at vente længe.

Moske ved Ground Zero? Der er allerede én i Pentagon

Som sagt. Mens de heroiske paranoide amerikanske patrioter racister kæmper en indædt kamp mod planerne om en moské vistnok kun få kilometer fra det sted, hvor World Trade Center stod, har de overset, at de onde muslimer allerede har fået sneget en moske ind i selveste Pentagon:

… opponents have apparently noticed perhaps an even more insidious threat: Muslims praying inside the Pentagon. As Justin Elliott noted  recently in Salon, the holy month of Ramadan has been observed, right in the heart of the U.S. defense establishment. Elliott points to a 2007 article from the Washington Times that exposes the reasons behind this nefarious plot:

“We live in a great nation,” said master of ceremonies Air Force Lt. Col. Timothy Oldenburg, a Muslim. “Yes, it is our First Amendment right do that — to practice our religion the way we feel, to worship God and to come to the Pentagon and celebrate Ramadan.”

This shocking lack of security begs the question: has the Pentagon itself secretly been shrouded in Sharia fairy dust powder? God only knows the horrors that could result from the free exercise of First Amendment rights!

Ja, hvad skal det dog ikke alt sammen ende med? Salon rapporterer:

Muslims have infiltrated the Pentagon for their nefarious, prayerful purposes — daring to practice their religion inside the building where 184 people died on Sept. 11, 2001. They haven’t even had the sensitivity to move two blocks, let alone a mile, away from that sacred site.

Any guesses as to why no one has ever heard about Muslims praying at the Pentagon — let alone cared? It’s almost as if the entire “ground zero mosque” controversy was whipped up out of nothing by a right-wing tabloid and politicians in search of a wedge issue …

Det endegyldige bevis: De er virkelig ude på at tage os ved næsen. De paranoide racister, altså,  med deres tåbelige protester over at også deres naboer kan få lov at praktisere deres religion.

Advarselsskilte til aviser

Den britiske komiker Tom Scott har designet nogle mærker til advarsel for forbrugerne, som aviserne burde sætte på deres artikler. Man skulle tro, han havde hørt om Politiken:

This article is basically just a press release, copied and pasted.

Oh yeah, that’s what they use. I forgot.

Medical claims in this article have not been confirmed by peer-reviewed research.

The Daily Mail’s attempt to classify everything as either ‘causing’ and ‘curing’ cancer is already well documented, but there’s plenty of wacky medical claims in all the newspapers. Ooh, look, some healing crystals.

To meet a deadline, this article was plagiarised from another news source.

To be fair, newspaper journalists have far too little time to do far too much, particularly with the steadily collapse of print circulations. If a story breaks just before the deadline, they may just copy it: but it seems only fair to require labelling in a case like this.

This article contains unsourced, unverified information from Wikipedia.

…and we all know what happens when you do this.

Journalist does not understand the subject they are writing about.

Now this’d be fine, if journalists were willing or able to call upon expert sources to verify claims, and then to quote their responses. Otherwise you get front-page headlines about cures for cancer based on small irrelevant studies on mice.

Link: Journalism Warning Labels (via Boing Boing).

Obama – den alt for lille forskel

Glenn Greenwald har fundet disse eksempler frem:

Robert Gibbs:

I hear these people saying he’s like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested. I mean, it’s crazy.

TPM:

Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Charlie Savage, The New York Times:

Bob Herbert, The New York Times:

Anthony Romero:

The Hill:

NYT Editorial Page:

I hope there are enough drug testing facilities to accommodate Talking Points Memo reporters, Charlie Savage, the lawyers from EFF, Bob Herbert, Anthony Romero, Russ Feingold, and The New York Times Editorial Board.  I don’t know anyone who asserts that Obama is the same as Bush — I don’t believe that and never asserted that — but if anyone needs to be “drug tested,” it would be those denying that many of Bush’s most controversial policies and actions have been embraced in full by Barack Obama.

Læs det hele. Læs endelig det hele (via Lenin’s Tomb).

Kashmir

– af Shuddhabrata Sengupta

Fra kafila.org, en god beskrivelse af en nylig demonstration og dens baggrund. Denne baggrund er blodig alvor: “The occupation of Kashmir by India and Pakistan is an immoral and evil fact of our times“. Men læs nu selv:

Kashmir Jantar MantarLast evening I went to Jantar Mantar after many years. It is a road I pass often, looking at the sad and melancholic little protests that line the kerb, whispering to an indifferent Capital the million mutinies of our banana plantation republic.

Last evening was different. There were perhaps four to five hundred people, many, but not all Kashmiri, men and women, who had gathered to protest against the wanton destruction of life in the Kashmir valley by the security apparatus of the Indian state in the last few weeks and months. 45 civilian deaths in 8 weeks signals a state losing its head. Especially when the deaths occur when the police and paramilitaries fire live bullets on unarmed or stone pelting mobs. When stones, or unarmed bodies are met with ammunition, you know that the state has no respect whatsoever for bare life. That this should happen in a state that calls itself a democracy should make all of us who are its citizens reflect on how hollow ‘democracy’ feels to the mother or friend of a young boy or girl who is felled by a ‘democratic’ bullet.

Protests in Delhi often have a routine, scripted quality. But this one was different. Professor S.A.R Geelani was level headed and dignified, as he spoke to the assembled, visibly upset young men and women, introduced each speaker in turn and appealed to people to stay calm, and not get provoked.

I don’t think that there has been a public gathering of young people from Kashmir in such numbers in Delhi, and the occasion had a cathartic, almost therapeutic character, as if the acknowledgment of each others presence could also make it possible for many amongst those gathered to say what needed to be said, loud and clear, in public, what they had only kept as a secret in their hearts.

As a citizen of the Indian republic, I can only hang my head in shame at the venality of the state, and at how it openly sanctions the murder of Kashmiri men, women and children on the streets of the valley. Even a leading member of the Israeli military establishment (not known for their kindness towards occupied Palestinians) has recently admonished India’s hard-line militarist mandarins in Kashmir on the appalling conditions that they administer in Kashmir.

I stood in silence at the meeting. Listened to the slogans, the chanting, the statements, some made by friends like Sanjay Kak, others by people I do not know personally, but whose work and politics I have an interest in, even if I do not agree with, such as the poet and ex-political prisoner Varavara Rao. I met some old friends, talked quietly to strangers, and felt a momentary twinge of pride in Delhi, at least about the fact that so many of us were reclaiming a space on Jantar Mantar, for once to break the enormously deafening silence about Kashmir in a public and peaceful manner.

There were different kinds of slogans that were heard. Most resonant of all was the slogan that has now become the signature of all protests in Kashmir, ‘Hum Kya Chahtey – Azaadi’ (‘What do we want – Freedom’) which speaks to the wide spectrum of sometimes disparate political currents and opinions which is together only because of one common objective – rightful anger at the continued occupation of Kashmir by the armed might of the Indian state. Some slogans stressed the unity of all Kashmiris – be they Pandit, Muslim or Sikh. Occasionally, the air did reverberate with slogans that some might interpret as having a more secterian tinge – the ‘Nara e Taqbeer – Allah o Akbar’. But the vast majority of slogans had simply one motif – ‘Azaadi’. Sometimes spoken with joy, sometimes with anger, sometimes as a lament, sometimes with hope – with the vowels elongated to mean a myriad complexities that are rendered unspoken by the simplifying violence of the occupation.

Many speakers, including Professor Geelani, and men and women people from the crowd, repeatedly made appeals not to ‘communalize’ the issue, and the same people who said, ‘Allah o Akbar’ also immediately switched to slogans emphasizing Kashmir’s secular fabric, and called for Pandit-Muslim-Sikh unity in Kashmir.

I did not feel perturbed by the airing of the ‘Allah o Akbar’ slogan, as I am not when I hear people say ‘Vande Mataram’ or indeed, ‘Jai Shree Ram’. I am not a believer, and the fervent expression of belief on the part of those who do believe, neither enthuses, nor disturbs me. In each case, I am more interested in what lies behind the passion. And I believed that what lay behind the passion last evening, despite the anxiety on some of the faces in the crowd, was an appeal to the divine as the final arbiter of justice and peace in a deeply violent and unjust world. I can understand what motivates people to make that claim, even if I cannot make it myself, especially in a situation, where all appeals to mundane, worldly power, seem to have exhausted themselves. A situation where stones are met with bullets and grenades can make even the most sceptical of us lose faith in the grace of the mortals who rule, ultimately, only with the force of arms.

Perhaps, not airing such slogans would have been tactically more intelligent. But I did not get the sense that those who had gathered in Jantar Mantar last evening had come to score intelligent and sophisticated political points. They had come to express their anger and their sadness, they had come to cease, for a brief moment, to be the anonymous, anxious Kashmiri in Delhi who is always worried about being labelled a ‘terrorist’ by a prejudiced neighbour, a callous policeman or a random stranger. They had come to be themselves, to mourn, and to tell the world of their mourning. I can only feel grateful that they could gather the courage to do this. There is an urgency, as Sanjay Kak reminded the gathering for forging an intelligent politics in response to what is going on in Kashmir, and that politics must not rest only on the engine of pain and anger. I totally agree with this, at the same time, I also know, that without an occasion like what we witnessed yesterday, when Kashmiris can openly express their desire for liberation and their anguish in the heart of India, in the vocabulary and language that has sustained their struggles over the past decades, it will not happen. I remain hopeful that it will.

Some speakers, including Varavara Rao, Mohan Jha (from Delhi University, I hope I got his name right), Sanjay Kak, and a sikh gentleman from Amritsar whose name escapes me, spoke of the fact that there was a great deal of solidarity in India for the just demands of the Kashmiri people. The occasion did not, at any instance, degenerate into a vulgar clash of competing nationalisms.

Outside the perimter of this protest, stood another – a small group of people associated with organizations that claim to represent the Kashmiri Pandit Diaspora, who were ‘protesting’ against the protest. I recognized a face in this crowd, I follow his self-righteous online outpourings quite regularly. Some of the speakers, including Mr. Geelani, alluded to them, saying that they shared in their pain, and even invited them to come and address the gathering. They however, remained aloof. Holding their placards, with their claim to monopoly of the pain and anguish of Kashmir. Ther stirred to life, when Sanjay Kak, spoke, heckling him, in a now familiar and churlish manner. I felt sad to see them, because they could make claim to suffering only as a means to divide people, not bring people together in solidarity.

Just before I left, a young woman who had recently come to Delhi to study, spoke eloquently about what it means to have lost a childhood in Kashmir, to have seen brothers and friends shot. I do not know who she is, and I could not catch her name, perhaps it was ‘Arshi’, but I wished I could apologize to her personally, because I know that her childhood has been robbed by people speaking in the name of the state that claims my fealty.

The occupation of Kashmir by India and Pakistan is an immoral and evil fact of our times. The sooner it ends, the better will it be for all of us in South Asia. True ‘Azaadi’ in Kashmir, for all its inhabitants, and for all those who have been displaced by more than twenty years of violence, can only help us all, in Delhi, and elsewhere, to breathe more freely.

Læs også: Kashmir på vej mod kanten

Støt Jørgen Dragsdahl

Den tidligere journalist og redaktør ved Information Jørgen Dragsdahl vandt for nylig en injuriesag mod professor Bent Jensen, som havde beskyldt ham for at være KGB-agent. Dragsdahl vandt sagen i retten, eftersom Bent Jensen ikke havde skygge af belæg for sine påstande.

Desværre løb omkostningerne til Dragsdahls egen advokat så højt op, at han i dag er ruineret. Det er ikke rimeligt, og der er derfor oprettet en støtteforening, der har til formål at dække Dragsdahls sagsomkostninger.

Foreningen forklarer selv formålet på sin hjemmeside:

Journalist Jørgen Dragsdahl vandt sin injuriesag mod professor Bent Jensen, som i 2007 i Jyllandsposten beskyldte ham for at have været agent for KGB. Dommen betyder, at man ikke behøver at finde sig i at blive beskyldt for landsforræderi alene fordi man kritiserer sit lands udenrigspolitik.

Bent Jensen har fået en bøde og skal betale erstatning. Alligevel risikerer Dragsdahl at blive ruineret af retssagens million-omkostninger. De kan blive endnu større, fordi Bent Jensen nu har anket dommen til Landsretten.

Vi er en kreds af borgere, som ikke finder det rimeligt, at man for at rense sig for falske beskyldninger må gå fra hus og hjem. Derfor har vi startet en indsamling til dækning af Jørgen Dragsdahls sagsomkostninger.

Bidrag indbetales på foreningens konto i Nordea: Reg.nr.: 2252 Konto nr. 0722-248-783. Et eventuelt overskud vil blive doneret til den danske PEN-klub

Jørgen Dragsdahls støtteforening

ved Søren Møller Christensen, Forlaget Vandkunsten

Et vigtigt aspekt af sagen er, som det antydes, at Jørgen Dragsdahl nu én gang har fået fastslået, at man ikke behøver at finde sig i at blive kaldt “landforræder”, bare fordi man er uenig i regeringens politik. Det er en ikke uvigtig detalje at få på plads, og det fortjener Dragsdahl faktisk stor anerkendelse for. Så … støt ham. Giv selv et bidrag, hvis du har råd, og giv ordet videre.

Link: Støtteforeningen for Jørgen Dragsdahl