Moske ved Ground Zero? Der er allerede én i Pentagon

Som sagt. Mens de heroiske paranoide amerikanske patrioter racister kæmper en indædt kamp mod planerne om en moské vistnok kun få kilometer fra det sted, hvor World Trade Center stod, har de overset, at de onde muslimer allerede har fået sneget en moske ind i selveste Pentagon:

… opponents have apparently noticed perhaps an even more insidious threat: Muslims praying inside the Pentagon. As Justin Elliott noted  recently in Salon, the holy month of Ramadan has been observed, right in the heart of the U.S. defense establishment. Elliott points to a 2007 article from the Washington Times that exposes the reasons behind this nefarious plot:

“We live in a great nation,” said master of ceremonies Air Force Lt. Col. Timothy Oldenburg, a Muslim. “Yes, it is our First Amendment right do that — to practice our religion the way we feel, to worship God and to come to the Pentagon and celebrate Ramadan.”

This shocking lack of security begs the question: has the Pentagon itself secretly been shrouded in Sharia fairy dust powder? God only knows the horrors that could result from the free exercise of First Amendment rights!

Ja, hvad skal det dog ikke alt sammen ende med? Salon rapporterer:

Muslims have infiltrated the Pentagon for their nefarious, prayerful purposes — daring to practice their religion inside the building where 184 people died on Sept. 11, 2001. They haven’t even had the sensitivity to move two blocks, let alone a mile, away from that sacred site.

Any guesses as to why no one has ever heard about Muslims praying at the Pentagon — let alone cared? It’s almost as if the entire “ground zero mosque” controversy was whipped up out of nothing by a right-wing tabloid and politicians in search of a wedge issue …

Det endegyldige bevis: De er virkelig ude på at tage os ved næsen. De paranoide racister, altså,  med deres tåbelige protester over at også deres naboer kan få lov at praktisere deres religion.

Advarselsskilte til aviser

Den britiske komiker Tom Scott har designet nogle mærker til advarsel for forbrugerne, som aviserne burde sætte på deres artikler. Man skulle tro, han havde hørt om Politiken:

This article is basically just a press release, copied and pasted.

Oh yeah, that’s what they use. I forgot.

Medical claims in this article have not been confirmed by peer-reviewed research.

The Daily Mail’s attempt to classify everything as either ‘causing’ and ‘curing’ cancer is already well documented, but there’s plenty of wacky medical claims in all the newspapers. Ooh, look, some healing crystals.

To meet a deadline, this article was plagiarised from another news source.

To be fair, newspaper journalists have far too little time to do far too much, particularly with the steadily collapse of print circulations. If a story breaks just before the deadline, they may just copy it: but it seems only fair to require labelling in a case like this.

This article contains unsourced, unverified information from Wikipedia.

…and we all know what happens when you do this.

Journalist does not understand the subject they are writing about.

Now this’d be fine, if journalists were willing or able to call upon expert sources to verify claims, and then to quote their responses. Otherwise you get front-page headlines about cures for cancer based on small irrelevant studies on mice.

Link: Journalism Warning Labels (via Boing Boing).

Obama – den alt for lille forskel

Glenn Greenwald har fundet disse eksempler frem:

Robert Gibbs:

I hear these people saying he’s like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested. I mean, it’s crazy.

TPM:

Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Charlie Savage, The New York Times:

Bob Herbert, The New York Times:

Anthony Romero:

The Hill:

NYT Editorial Page:

I hope there are enough drug testing facilities to accommodate Talking Points Memo reporters, Charlie Savage, the lawyers from EFF, Bob Herbert, Anthony Romero, Russ Feingold, and The New York Times Editorial Board.  I don’t know anyone who asserts that Obama is the same as Bush — I don’t believe that and never asserted that — but if anyone needs to be “drug tested,” it would be those denying that many of Bush’s most controversial policies and actions have been embraced in full by Barack Obama.

Læs det hele. Læs endelig det hele (via Lenin’s Tomb).

Kashmir

– af Shuddhabrata Sengupta

Fra kafila.org, en god beskrivelse af en nylig demonstration og dens baggrund. Denne baggrund er blodig alvor: “The occupation of Kashmir by India and Pakistan is an immoral and evil fact of our times“. Men læs nu selv:

Kashmir Jantar MantarLast evening I went to Jantar Mantar after many years. It is a road I pass often, looking at the sad and melancholic little protests that line the kerb, whispering to an indifferent Capital the million mutinies of our banana plantation republic.

Last evening was different. There were perhaps four to five hundred people, many, but not all Kashmiri, men and women, who had gathered to protest against the wanton destruction of life in the Kashmir valley by the security apparatus of the Indian state in the last few weeks and months. 45 civilian deaths in 8 weeks signals a state losing its head. Especially when the deaths occur when the police and paramilitaries fire live bullets on unarmed or stone pelting mobs. When stones, or unarmed bodies are met with ammunition, you know that the state has no respect whatsoever for bare life. That this should happen in a state that calls itself a democracy should make all of us who are its citizens reflect on how hollow ‘democracy’ feels to the mother or friend of a young boy or girl who is felled by a ‘democratic’ bullet.

Protests in Delhi often have a routine, scripted quality. But this one was different. Professor S.A.R Geelani was level headed and dignified, as he spoke to the assembled, visibly upset young men and women, introduced each speaker in turn and appealed to people to stay calm, and not get provoked.

I don’t think that there has been a public gathering of young people from Kashmir in such numbers in Delhi, and the occasion had a cathartic, almost therapeutic character, as if the acknowledgment of each others presence could also make it possible for many amongst those gathered to say what needed to be said, loud and clear, in public, what they had only kept as a secret in their hearts.

As a citizen of the Indian republic, I can only hang my head in shame at the venality of the state, and at how it openly sanctions the murder of Kashmiri men, women and children on the streets of the valley. Even a leading member of the Israeli military establishment (not known for their kindness towards occupied Palestinians) has recently admonished India’s hard-line militarist mandarins in Kashmir on the appalling conditions that they administer in Kashmir.

I stood in silence at the meeting. Listened to the slogans, the chanting, the statements, some made by friends like Sanjay Kak, others by people I do not know personally, but whose work and politics I have an interest in, even if I do not agree with, such as the poet and ex-political prisoner Varavara Rao. I met some old friends, talked quietly to strangers, and felt a momentary twinge of pride in Delhi, at least about the fact that so many of us were reclaiming a space on Jantar Mantar, for once to break the enormously deafening silence about Kashmir in a public and peaceful manner.

There were different kinds of slogans that were heard. Most resonant of all was the slogan that has now become the signature of all protests in Kashmir, ‘Hum Kya Chahtey – Azaadi’ (‘What do we want – Freedom’) which speaks to the wide spectrum of sometimes disparate political currents and opinions which is together only because of one common objective – rightful anger at the continued occupation of Kashmir by the armed might of the Indian state. Some slogans stressed the unity of all Kashmiris – be they Pandit, Muslim or Sikh. Occasionally, the air did reverberate with slogans that some might interpret as having a more secterian tinge – the ‘Nara e Taqbeer – Allah o Akbar’. But the vast majority of slogans had simply one motif – ‘Azaadi’. Sometimes spoken with joy, sometimes with anger, sometimes as a lament, sometimes with hope – with the vowels elongated to mean a myriad complexities that are rendered unspoken by the simplifying violence of the occupation.

Many speakers, including Professor Geelani, and men and women people from the crowd, repeatedly made appeals not to ‘communalize’ the issue, and the same people who said, ‘Allah o Akbar’ also immediately switched to slogans emphasizing Kashmir’s secular fabric, and called for Pandit-Muslim-Sikh unity in Kashmir.

I did not feel perturbed by the airing of the ‘Allah o Akbar’ slogan, as I am not when I hear people say ‘Vande Mataram’ or indeed, ‘Jai Shree Ram’. I am not a believer, and the fervent expression of belief on the part of those who do believe, neither enthuses, nor disturbs me. In each case, I am more interested in what lies behind the passion. And I believed that what lay behind the passion last evening, despite the anxiety on some of the faces in the crowd, was an appeal to the divine as the final arbiter of justice and peace in a deeply violent and unjust world. I can understand what motivates people to make that claim, even if I cannot make it myself, especially in a situation, where all appeals to mundane, worldly power, seem to have exhausted themselves. A situation where stones are met with bullets and grenades can make even the most sceptical of us lose faith in the grace of the mortals who rule, ultimately, only with the force of arms.

Perhaps, not airing such slogans would have been tactically more intelligent. But I did not get the sense that those who had gathered in Jantar Mantar last evening had come to score intelligent and sophisticated political points. They had come to express their anger and their sadness, they had come to cease, for a brief moment, to be the anonymous, anxious Kashmiri in Delhi who is always worried about being labelled a ‘terrorist’ by a prejudiced neighbour, a callous policeman or a random stranger. They had come to be themselves, to mourn, and to tell the world of their mourning. I can only feel grateful that they could gather the courage to do this. There is an urgency, as Sanjay Kak reminded the gathering for forging an intelligent politics in response to what is going on in Kashmir, and that politics must not rest only on the engine of pain and anger. I totally agree with this, at the same time, I also know, that without an occasion like what we witnessed yesterday, when Kashmiris can openly express their desire for liberation and their anguish in the heart of India, in the vocabulary and language that has sustained their struggles over the past decades, it will not happen. I remain hopeful that it will.

Some speakers, including Varavara Rao, Mohan Jha (from Delhi University, I hope I got his name right), Sanjay Kak, and a sikh gentleman from Amritsar whose name escapes me, spoke of the fact that there was a great deal of solidarity in India for the just demands of the Kashmiri people. The occasion did not, at any instance, degenerate into a vulgar clash of competing nationalisms.

Outside the perimter of this protest, stood another – a small group of people associated with organizations that claim to represent the Kashmiri Pandit Diaspora, who were ‘protesting’ against the protest. I recognized a face in this crowd, I follow his self-righteous online outpourings quite regularly. Some of the speakers, including Mr. Geelani, alluded to them, saying that they shared in their pain, and even invited them to come and address the gathering. They however, remained aloof. Holding their placards, with their claim to monopoly of the pain and anguish of Kashmir. Ther stirred to life, when Sanjay Kak, spoke, heckling him, in a now familiar and churlish manner. I felt sad to see them, because they could make claim to suffering only as a means to divide people, not bring people together in solidarity.

Just before I left, a young woman who had recently come to Delhi to study, spoke eloquently about what it means to have lost a childhood in Kashmir, to have seen brothers and friends shot. I do not know who she is, and I could not catch her name, perhaps it was ‘Arshi’, but I wished I could apologize to her personally, because I know that her childhood has been robbed by people speaking in the name of the state that claims my fealty.

The occupation of Kashmir by India and Pakistan is an immoral and evil fact of our times. The sooner it ends, the better will it be for all of us in South Asia. True ‘Azaadi’ in Kashmir, for all its inhabitants, and for all those who have been displaced by more than twenty years of violence, can only help us all, in Delhi, and elsewhere, to breathe more freely.

Læs også: Kashmir på vej mod kanten

Støt Jørgen Dragsdahl

Den tidligere journalist og redaktør ved Information Jørgen Dragsdahl vandt for nylig en injuriesag mod professor Bent Jensen, som havde beskyldt ham for at være KGB-agent. Dragsdahl vandt sagen i retten, eftersom Bent Jensen ikke havde skygge af belæg for sine påstande.

Desværre løb omkostningerne til Dragsdahls egen advokat så højt op, at han i dag er ruineret. Det er ikke rimeligt, og der er derfor oprettet en støtteforening, der har til formål at dække Dragsdahls sagsomkostninger.

Foreningen forklarer selv formålet på sin hjemmeside:

Journalist Jørgen Dragsdahl vandt sin injuriesag mod professor Bent Jensen, som i 2007 i Jyllandsposten beskyldte ham for at have været agent for KGB. Dommen betyder, at man ikke behøver at finde sig i at blive beskyldt for landsforræderi alene fordi man kritiserer sit lands udenrigspolitik.

Bent Jensen har fået en bøde og skal betale erstatning. Alligevel risikerer Dragsdahl at blive ruineret af retssagens million-omkostninger. De kan blive endnu større, fordi Bent Jensen nu har anket dommen til Landsretten.

Vi er en kreds af borgere, som ikke finder det rimeligt, at man for at rense sig for falske beskyldninger må gå fra hus og hjem. Derfor har vi startet en indsamling til dækning af Jørgen Dragsdahls sagsomkostninger.

Bidrag indbetales på foreningens konto i Nordea: Reg.nr.: 2252 Konto nr. 0722-248-783. Et eventuelt overskud vil blive doneret til den danske PEN-klub

Jørgen Dragsdahls støtteforening

ved Søren Møller Christensen, Forlaget Vandkunsten

Et vigtigt aspekt af sagen er, som det antydes, at Jørgen Dragsdahl nu én gang har fået fastslået, at man ikke behøver at finde sig i at blive kaldt “landforræder”, bare fordi man er uenig i regeringens politik. Det er en ikke uvigtig detalje at få på plads, og det fortjener Dragsdahl faktisk stor anerkendelse for. Så … støt ham. Giv selv et bidrag, hvis du har råd, og giv ordet videre.

Link: Støtteforeningen for Jørgen Dragsdahl

DF kræver 28-års-regel som belønning for ‘tro tjeneste’

Dansk Folkeparti kræver nu, at 24-års-reglen bliver lavet om til en 28-års-regel – ingen familiesammenføring med ægtefælle, med mindre begge parter er over 28 – og mener, at regeringen umuligt kan afvise kravet, når nu de lige har stemt for regeringens “genopretningsplan“. Heraf kan man jo i hvert fald konkludere, at Dansk Folkeparti altså ikke selv troede på genopretningsplanens påstået gavnlige virkninger, for hvis de havde gjort det, ville de selvfølgelig have stemt på den uden at forlange noget til gengæld. Det påstod de ellers dengang, at de gjorde …

Men får DF så deres vilje – kommer det til at gå glat igennem også denne gang? Vi vil ignorere kynikerne på bagerste række og i stedet se på de hårde og kolde fakta. Babsalicious rapporterer:

After all, Denmark is really similar to most other non muslim lands isn’t it?  We are all the same non muslims aren’t we?  And we all eat pig.  Let’s face it.  Theres a desirable foreigner (one who will slot into what is Dannish) and there is the undesirable foreigner, who won’t.

And we all know what the dirty foreigners do don’t we?  They rape their young daughters and marry them off to their uncles who circumcise them with rusty tins and bottle tops.  This is the way of the dusky dirty foreigner who won’t gobble our pork scented demands OR get the Danish flag tattoed on the asses of themselves and/or offspring.  To curb this dirty foreign influx, and in the name of the Righteous Fight against Terror in Afghanistan and the disease of Muslim Horror threatening to burn down Fastelavn and JUL,  we shall have the laws tightened,  and one of the best ways to do this is to hit them where it hurts, in the dirty foreigners organized crime of arranged marriage.

I digress.

Kristits Thickhead Dahl Weinerbrain of the DFP is quoted as saying, and i restrain myself by translating it word for word because the DFP are transparent and basic, he says:

“The ’24 Years Law’ has had a collosal positive effect against forced marriage and arranged marriages. It will, therefore, be natural to open up to a 28 year ruling, so we can reap the rewards to an even higher level.”  Says Kristits Thickhead Dahl Weinerbrain of the DFP.

At the same time, Kristits Thickhead Dahl Weinerbrain of the DFP, made it clear that the rest of the poxy Danish government cannot say no to the demands because the DFP, just a few months ago, gave their Danish government buddies a really long hard suck on the knob of the ‘Economic Recovery Package.’

“We bent over for you, and made like we LIKED it, now you give us a bit of that Danejuice what we like back!”  Say The DFP, or words to that effect.

“Something for something.”  Said Kristits Thickhead Dahl Weinerbrain of the DFP. (ACTUAL QUOTE).

Det kan godt være, at Kristen Pulesen Gahl ikke udtrykte det helt så firkantet, men vi ved jo godt, at det er, hvad det kan koges ned til. DF lod regeringen og dens rige venner gøre det, de ville, og nu kræver de så deres betaling. Jeg tror egentlig gerne snart jeg vil vågne op, så jeg kan prøve et nyt mareridt i stedet.

En englænders oplevelse af Danmark

De sidste år har vi gang på gang hørt om, hvor store problemer “udlændingene” skaber i vort samfund. Den slags vrøvl har vi især hørt fra Dansk Folkepari, men desværre også fra samtlige politiske partier på nær Enhedslisten  og de radikale. SFs og Villy Søvndals knæfald for tidens racisme er blandt de mest pinlige optrin i dansk politik i mange år.

Men det siger sig selv, at denne mistænkeliggørelse også virker tilbage på de berørte “udlændinge”. Når mange mennesker med gode uddannelser og solide jobs så brokker sig og siger, at de faktisk ikke synes, de skaber problemer, skynder man sig ofte at sige, at sådan nogle hårdtarbejdende udlændinge vil man gerne have til landet, det er “de andre” …

Den britiske blogger skatesection, der i snart to år har undervist på en folkeskole i en mindre by i Jylland fortæller i et  indlæg om, hvordan hun havde håbet på til sin tid at kunne sige, at Danmark er et dejligt land med en fri kultur, som hun dog ender med at forlade, fordi hun dybest set savner at være i et engelsktalende land.

Efter to år er hun desværre bare ved at få nok, og her er, hvad hun vil være nødt til at sige, når hun om ikke så længe har forladt landet:

I went to see how other schools work and I wanted to learn another language… I was not sure if I wanted to settle there but in the end, I decided that the political environment was threatening. Every time I turned on the news, it would be about how immigrants were fucking up the country. Eating sandwiches, knitting, riding a bike… these activities would rarely escape comment about me “doing it properly”. I worked my ass off to learn the language but they are so unused to foreign accents that they cannot understand me and occasionally people would be mean to me. They had a lovely culture, so free and gentle but it has been hijacked by the far right and the influence of these people has forced all the parties (and people), right wards. What was once cozy and quaint is now warped. Most of the people are generous and fun but a significant minority are mean spirited and cruel. The parties are great but I was rarely invited to them, I had to make friends with other immigrants almost exclusively after two years (I had no partner to give me an “in”) I loved the pace of life but the flip side was that a lot of the services I relied on would be done “half-assed” (or non-assed at all)… In the end, I was terrified of having children with a Dane and then getting stuck there… especially since the right wing are completely unchecked and things look like they might get fascist really quick. I missed being in a country where I would be sure that if someone was being mean to me it was because I had done something wrong or they were having a bad day and not because I speak with an accent.

Danmark er altså ikke et varmt, åbent, venligt og indbydende land for fremmede – uanset, hvor de kommer fra. Måske det var på tide, om vi tog os sammen og gjorde noget ved det.

Link: What I would have wanted

Aktivering: Slave, mærk din herres pisk!

Capac har historien om den unge mand, som var kaldt til møde på jobcentret – men gerne ville have det udsat, fordi hans mor pludselig var død og skulle begraves den dag.

Jobcentrets svar?

Dagbladet Holstebro-Stuer fortæller historien om den 32-årige Torben Frederiksen fra Hjerm, hvis mor døde af kræft i søndags og som bliver begravet torsdag.

Torben Jørgensen var også indkaldt til et informationsmøde på Jobcentret i Struer torsdag, og da han henvendte sig for at melde afbud, fik han at vide, at begravelse ikke tæller som grund til ikke at møde op.

Som arbejdsløs skal man altså ikke være et øjeblik i tvivl om, hvem der bestemmer her. Jeg er selv arbejdsløs og kan berette, at der til et møde i jobcentret typisk foregår det, at man forklarer, hvilke jobs, man har søgt det sidste stykke tid, og viser konsulenten to eller flere opslåede stillinger, man kan søge. Det er absolut ikke noget, som ikke kan udsættes eller som man overhovedet burde spilde nogens tid med.

En tankevækkende opvågnen til dem, der tror, at slaveriet er afskaffet i det moderne samfund.