Category: Politik

Fængslingen af Alaa er et angreb på hele den egyptiske revolution

Den egyptiske forfatter Ahdaf Soueif i The Guardian:

Alaa is a techie, a programmer of note. He and Manal, his wife and colleague, work in developing open-source software platforms and in linguistic exchange. They terminated contracts abroad and flew home to join the revolution. In Tahrir he moved between groups; listening, facilitating, making peace when necessary, defending the square physically when he had to.

He started the TweetNadwa series – the corporeal meetings of the Twitter community. In one of those, in Tahrir, I understood the remarkable role he played. We sat on the ground, a screen displaying rolling tweets, discussing the restructuring of Mubarak’s brutal security apparatus. Comments and questions could only use two minutes. If you liked what you heard you fluttered your raised hand. Passersby stopped and, intrigued, they stayed and contributed. The numbers grew to over a thousand from every background: enabled, together, working out ways forward, and Alaa in the middle, facilitating, directing, articulating, engaged, and passionate. (…)

He was to enter a major confrontation with the military when, on 9 October, a peaceful (mainly Coptic) protest was attacked by the army and, worried, Alaa went looking for his friend, the activist Mina Daniel. He found him in the Coptic hospital, among the dead.

Alaa and his friends then did something remarkable; from the morgue they took on the entire system. In the face of the hospital issuing death certificates from “natural causes” they persuaded the stricken families to demand autopsies. Activist lawyers pressured the public prosecutor to order them. They fetched the coroner and his staff and persuaded them to carry out the autopsies in the presence of physicians whom they trusted. And then they sat them individually with the families to explain the reports to them.

The hospital morgue only had three drawers, so all the while they treated the bodies of their comrades with ice and fans, and they treated the anger, grief and suspicion of the families with tears and embraces and explanations. Thus they foiled the attempt to cause sectarian violence, and to get rid of the evidence of the bodies, and they mobilised the families to demand an investigation.

Og nu er han i fængsel, fængslet af en af de illegitime militærdomstole for at have “opfordret til vold mod militæret”. Soueif skriver: No one believes that the military believe the charges they’ve levelled against Alaa; in attacking this central, charismatic figure they appear to be openly mounting an attack on the very spirit of the revolution.

Det er i alle tilfælde i disse måneder, at det afgøres, om oprøret i Egypten skal ende med at gøre en permanent forskel – eller om militæret med trofast støtte fra Vesten vil fortsætte deres egen udgave af Mubaraks terror.

En liste på 20 løftebrud

Det er interessant at høre den nye oppositionen – og især V og K brokke sig over den nuværende regering og beskylde dem for løftebrud. Det må være årtiets største hykleri. Jeg vil her ikke tage fat i valgløfterne – men blot nogle få udklip fra V og K regeringsgrundlag fra 2001 – et grundlag som V og K havde 10 år til at gennemføre:

Velfærden skal sikres, styrkes og udbygges. Der skal skabes ny vækst og dynamik i samfundet til glæde for alle. (..). Der skal være mere overskud til de svageste. Der skal være plads til os alle. – Løftebrud nr. 1

Regeringen vil styrke (..), omsorgen for de ældre og hjælpen til de svageste. – løftebrud nr. 2

Den tiltagende internationalisering af økonomi, kultur og kommunikation stiller os over for nye udfordringer i de kommende år. Regeringen vil gennemføre økonomiske og sociale reformer, som  ruster det danske samfund til at møde disse udfordringer. – løftebrud nr. 3

Regeringen vil føre en aktiv miljøpolitik, som sikrer, at fremtidige generationer kan leve i et rent miljø. Danmark skal være blandt de bedste til at nedbringe forurening – løftebrud nr. 4

Regeringen ønsker et stærkere, men slankere EU. EU skal blive bedre og mere effektiv til at løse de opgaver, som virkelig er grænseoverskridende. – løftebrud nr. 5

Regeringen finder, at forbeholdene er i strid med Danmarks interesser. Regeringen anser det samtidig for helt afgørende, at dansk EU-politik på disse områder hviler på det nødvendige folkelige fundament. Ophævelse af forbeholdene kan kun ske ved ny folkeafstemning. – løftebrud nr. 6

Regeringen vil føre en stram offentlig udgiftspolitik – løftebrud nr. 7

Postudbringningen liberaliseres. Regeringen vil forberede privatisering af PostDanmark. – løftebrud nr. 8

Det skal være slut med stigningen i skatter og afgifter. løftebrud nr. 9

Det er regeringens mål at sænke beskatningen i det danske samfund. – Løftebrud nr. 10

Regeringen vil forstærke det fælles ansvar for de svageste i vort samfund.  Der vil blive afsat flere ressourcer til hjemløse, sindslidende og handicappede samt til at forebygge narko- og alkoholmisbrug.  – Løftebrud nr. 11

Regeringen ønsker en konsekvent og retfærdig udlændingepolitik. – Løftebrud nr. 12

Regeringen ønsker at forbedre borgernes retssikkerhed. – Løftebrud nr. 13

Tilskud til landbruget skal gradvis afvikles. – Løftebrud nr. 14

Regeringen vil derfor sikre en høj kvalitet i uddannelsessystemet. – Løftebrud nr. 15

Der skal gøres op med SystemDanmark, hvor reglerne har taget overhånd. Det er nødvendigt med en målrettet indsats for at forenkle administrationen i den offentlige sektor. Den offentlige sektor skal gøres enklere, mere åben og mere lydhør over for borgere og virksomheder. – Løftebrud nr. 16

Tilsvarende er der behov for at forenkle og begrænse reguleringen af den private sektor. – Løftebrud nr. 17

Mindre bureaukrati  – færre råd,nævn, puljer og tilskud – Løftebrud nr. 18

Regeringens kulturpolitik vil bygge på frisind, forskellighed og fællesskab – Løftebrud nr. 19

Regeringen vil forbedre trafiksikkerheden. – Løftebrud nr. 20

Occupy Wall Street – solidaritet med Egypten

Jeg har ikke så meget tid til at blogge eller følge med i den politiske udvikling i disse dage – nyt job og en masse mere langsigtede gøremål tager al tiden. I mellemtiden, et citat fra The Guardian om forbindelsen mellem Occupy og den egyptiske revolution, netop som de egyptiske generaler for alvor begynder at stramme nettet:

In a statement appealing for solidarity from the worldwide Occupy movement that has taken control of public squares in London, New York and hundreds of other cities, campaigners in Egypt claim their revolution is “under attack” from army generals and insist they too are fighting against a “1%” elite intent on stifling democracy and promoting social injustice.

The announcement came as Alaa Abd El Fattah, the jailed Egyptian revolutionary who has become a rallying figure for those opposed to the junta, had his appeal against detention refused by a military court. He and 30 other defendants accused of inciting violence against the military will remain in prison for at least 10 more days. The authorities could then choose to extend their incarceration indefinitely. This week a secret letter written by Abd El Fattah from inside his cell at Bab el-Khalq jail was published by the Guardian and the Egyptian newspaper al-Shorouk, laying bare the growing chasm between the ruling generals and grassroots activists who believe that their revolution has been hijacked.

In Thursday’s communique, which was jointly signed by a number of activist groups and published on the website of the “No to military trials” campaign, Egyptian protesters say that while global media attention has shifted elsewhere since the toppling of Hosni Mubarak in February, their struggle has continued.

“Again and again the army and the police have attacked us, beaten us, arrested us, killed us,” reads the statement. “And we have resisted, we have continued; some of these days we lost, others we won, but never without cost. Over a thousand gave their lives to remove Mubarak. Many more have joined them in death since. We go on so that their deaths will not be in vain.”

The statement reaffirms activists’ decision to withdraw all co-operation from the military justice system: “We now refuse to co-operate with military trials and prosecutions. We will not hand ourselves in, we will not submit ourselves to questioning. If they want us, they can take us from our homes and workplaces.”

It ends with a call for an international day of action on 12 November. “Nine months into our new military repression, we are still fighting for our revolution,” the activists conclude. “Our strength is in our shared struggle. If they stifle our resistance, the 1% will win – in Cairo, New York, London, Rome – everywhere. But while the revolution lives, our imaginations knows no bounds. We can still create a world worth living.”

Sandy Nurse, of Occupy Wall Street, said: “The Egyptian people have changed the face of the regime and the revolution is momentous but unfortunately it is far from over. Changing the face of the regime, getting rid of Mubarak, is like changing the curtains: the military is in control of the country and has been for a long time.”

Nurse, who is on the direct action committee of OWS, expressed her personal solidarity with the people of Egypt and added: “I believe Occupy Wall Street would be in solidarity with the continued struggle of the Egyptian protesters.”

Anup Desai, a press spokesman for OWS, said: “The effort put out by the entire country in Egypt gave us motivation. Egypt has won the first step. I was not aware what was happening so I am grateful for this opportunity to learn and I thank the Egyptian activists. What is happening with the military and the military courts is 100% wrong and we need to share this and tell people about it.”

Desai, who is also a professor of philosophy at City University of New York, expressed solidarity with the activists and said: “We need to keep coming together.”

Naomi Colvin, from the Occupy London movement, said: “All decisions are made through a general assembly but I’m sure we will strongly support the call from our friends in the Middle East to stand in solidarity with them through an international day of action.

“Egyptians provided us with an example of courage that has inspired not only our own protest but many others around the world, and we owe it to them to support their ongoing struggle in any way we can.”

Aktivister fængsles, Mubarak-modstandere som Alaa i fængsel igen, et udkast til en ny forfatning, hvor militærets jerngreb om magten gøres konstant; og et Europa og et USA, hvor magthaverne kunne tænke sig at opnå en lignende kontrol i form af antiterrorlove, overvågning og i USAs tilfælde nu også systematiske snigmord af “besværlige” modstandere. Alt imens de store europæiske regeringer vil tvinge Grækenland til kolossale besparelser for at redde bankerne ved hjælp af nogle penge, som den græske befolkning slet ikke skylder – alt mens ingen eller stort set ingen medier udfordrer den officielle historie om “den græske gæld”.

Der er mere brug for den politiske vrede, som Occupy Wall Street og Tahrir repræsenterer, end der har været længe.

Tahrir Square: Protest mod politivold i Oakland

Hvis du stadig tror, intet har forandret sig det sidste års tid: Disse billeder er fra Tahrir Square i Kairo, hvor demonstranter viser deres solidaritet med Occupy Wall Street og ofrene for politivold i Oakland, Californien. Almindelige egyptere demonstrerer i solidaritet med almindelige amerikanere, og folk i USA er glade for og stolte af støtten. Det er for tidligt at sige, hvad det ender med at komme til at betyde, men noget er bristet.

As they vowed earlier this week to do, Egyptian pro-democracy protesters marched from Tahrir square to the U.S. Embassy today to march in support of Occupy Oakland—and against police brutality witnessed in Oakland on Tuesday night, and commonly experienced in Egypt.

Above and below, photos from Egyptian blogger Mohammed Maree, who is there at the march live-tweeting. He is a journalist with Egytimes.org, a human rights activist, and a veterinarian …

Link: Egyptians march from Tahrir Square to support Oakland protesters.

Guantanamo er en torturlejr

Ja, det skal uforbederligt venstreorienterede eller i hvert fald krigskritiske stemmer jo sige. Er det Michael Moore, der nu igen har været ved at blamere sig?

Nej, denne gang kommer kritikken fra den amerikanske regerings ledende statsadvokat på Guantanamo-lejren med ansvar for at retsforfølge de mistænkte i Bushs “krig mod terror”. Den nu pensionerede oberst Morris Davis lægger ikke fingrene imellem, når han beskriver sin egen tidligere arbejdsplads:

Retired air force colonel Morris Davis resigned in October 2007 in protest against interrogation methods at Guantánamo, and has made his remarks in the lead-up to 13 November, the anniversary of President George W Bush’s executive order setting up military commissions to try terrorist suspects.

Davis said that the methods of interrogation used on Guantánamo detainees – which he described as “torture” – were in breach of the US’s own statutes on torture, and added: “If torture is a crime, it should be prosecuted.”

The US military, he said, had been ordered to use unlawful methods of interrogation by “civilian politicians, and to do so against our will and judgment”.

Davis was speaking at a conference on human rights law at Bard College in New York state. After resigning from the armed forces, in a dramatic defection to the other side of the raging debate over conditions at the camp, he became executive director of, and counsel to, the Crimes of War project based in Washington DC. The speech was to launch the project’s 10th anniversary campaign and to protest against the existence of the camp and the torture there and at so-called “black sites” run by US intelligence around the world.

“No court has jurisdiction over Guantánamo,” said Davis. “Some senior civilian Bush adminstration officials chose Guantánamo to interrogate detainees because they thought it’s a law-free zone where we can unlawfully… handle a very small number of cases. We have turned our backs on the law and created what we believed was a place outside the law’s reach.” He added that America was “great at preaching to others, but not so good at practising what we preach. There is a point when enough is enough, and you have to look at yourself in the mirror. Torture has no place in American courts.”

Link: Former US chief prosecutor condemns torture in Guantanamo

Dagens citat: Occupy Wall Street

USAs præsident Barack Obama:

Square by square, town by town, country by country, the people have risen up to demand their basic human rights. (…)The United States supports a set of universal rights. And these rights include free speech, the freedom of peaceful assembly…

Nåh nej, det var noget helt andet, han talte om. Eller var det?

Herunder ser vi Oaklands heroiske politi, der forsvarer Mubaraks dikatur det amerikanske demokrati mod demonstranter, der forsøger at komme en såret kammerat til undsætning:

De store virksomheder har begået statskup i mit land

Det er ikke mig, der siger det, eller Danmark, der er tale om.

Chris Hedges har tilbragt tyve år som krigskorrespondent for New York Times, Dallas Morning News og Christian Science Monitor og havde en ganske ubehagelig aha-oplevelse, da han kom tilbage: “I came back and realized that corporations have carried out a coup d’état in my country.”

Flere citater:

“I covered the street demonstrations that brought down Milošević, I’ve covered both of the Palestinian intifadas, and once movements like this start and articulate a fundamental truth about the society that they live in, and expose the repression, the mendacity, the corruption and the decay of structures of power, then they have a kind of centrifugal force, you never know where they’re going.”

He went on: “What happens, and it’s true in all of these movements as well, is the foot soldiers of the elite, the blue uniform police, the mechanisms of control, finally don’t want to impede the movement. At that point, the power elite is left defenseless. So, where’s it going? No one knows. Even the people most intimately involved in the organization don’t know. All of these movements take on a kind of life and color that in some ways is finally mysterious. The only thing I can say, having been in the middle of similar movements, is that this one is real … And this one could take ‘em all down.”

Men se nu endelig det hele.

Occupy London: Et øjebliksbillede

Richard Seymour har besøgt besætterne i det central London og rapporterer på sin blog Lenin’s Tomb:

Despite the emphasis on avoiding ‘leadership’ in the traditional sense, there is an elaborate division of labour involving working groups on every area of the work that needs to be done to keep the thing going.  These report back to the general assembly, which tends to be held at between 12-1pm and then again at 7pm each day.  I won’t labour the details of process.  The principles of consensual ratification and decision-making are familiar enough by now.  Essentially, when asked to vote on a proposal, you can vote ‘yes’, ‘no’, or ‘block’.  Only if someone ‘blocks’ a decision does a majority not result in a motion being passed.  This means that if someone has serious objections, their ideas or interests have to be taken into account somehow.  Of course, this is intended to frustrate the emergence of any kind of centralised leadership.  “We don’t need another Scargill, or another Swampy, I was told.  We don’t need another leader they can cut down.”  At the moment, the swarm is prevailing over the vanguard.  Naturally, I’m sceptical of all this, but it’s only fair to say that everyone I spoke to said it had worked quite well.  At any rate, the occupation is digging itself in somewhat and it seems to be well enough organised for present purposes.
***
But where can Occupy London go?  I wanted to dip my toe in the water of the politics of the occupation, so I asked about the heterogenous political elements present, and what people thought was the dominant tendency.  There is an idea, which I heard a few times, that “this is not about left and right”.  One person I spoke to said explicitly that it was not just a left-wing event, and explained that there were many present who wouldn’t call themselves left-wing.  Strangely, this insistence sits alongside a set of classic left-wing ideological articulations.  Catherine at the media centre said that “these old ideas of political divisions are not necessarily relevant,” before going on to add, “because this is about the 99%, this is about the have-nots, versus the have-yachts.”
(…)
The sign on the wall says ‘Tahrir Square, EC4M’.  The sneering article on Huffington Post UK, observing this, quoted someone saying “it’s not remotely like Egypt”.  Well, of course it’s not like Egypt.  This isn’t a revolutionary situation, but merely a punctuating moment in the temporal flow of class struggle.  But the purpose of slogans mentioning ‘Tahrir Square’ is to accentuate the internationalism of the movement, to point to its deep systemic roots, to express solidarity with the Arab Spring, to hope that this is the beginning of our own Spring, and to identify the commune as the political form of these aspirations.  At the most prosaic level, it expresses the movement against austerity in its most ‘political’ moment, complementing the ‘economic corporatist’ moment of trade union struggle.  It identifies the political class rule of  the 1% as the key problem; the colonization of the representative state by big capital.  And it proposes its own direct democratic answer.  Of course, Occupy London is not yet a commune.  But it is the germ of a commune.  Perhaps its fruition will be when the germ takes seed in the heart of productive relations; when the commune is the workers’ answer to the power of the 1%.